The long-awaited return of one of anime’s most beloved comedy series is now official. On 13 January 2026, during a special livestream marking the 10th anniversary of the anime adaptation, KonoSuba: God’s Blessing on This Wonderful World! was confirmed to be receiving a fourth television season.
The announcement was made by the core voice cast—Jun Fukushima (Kazuma Satou), Sora Amamiya (Aqua), Rie Takahashi (Megumin) & Ai Kayano (Darkness)—who hosted the event. This follows an earlier tease of a sequel after the BONUS STAGE theatrical OVAs in March 2025, clarifying that the project is a full TV continuation rather than additional OVAs or a film.
No specific release window, staff details or episode count has been disclosed yet. Production is underway, with speculation pointing towards a potential 2026 or 2027 premiere based on previous gaps & recent production pace (Season 3 aired in 2024 under Studio Drive). The series will likely adapt further light novel volumes, continuing the chaotic adventures of Kazuma & his dysfunctional party after covering up to roughly volumes 6–7 in prior seasons.
The official announcement visual & related reveals have generated significant excitement within the community, underscoring the enduring appeal of the series’ sharp parody of isekai tropes, irreverent humour & memorable character dynamics.
For the latest updates, visit the official website at konosuba.com. As the franchise enters its second decade, 2026 promises to be a landmark year for fans worldwide.
Unless otherwise noted, image assets above are NOT original content & are shared under fair use doctrine with NO claims to authorship or ownership. Contact necrolicious@necrolicious.com for credit or removal.
This post was sponsored by…ME! If you’d like to support, please buy my original meme merch from Necrolicious.store or check out my affiliate links to get yourself some other cool things. Additional affiliate links may be contained in the above article. If you click on an affiliate link & sign up/make a purchase, I may earn a commission. This does not increase the price you pay for the product or service, so it helps support this website at no cost to you.
I got the DJI NANO but Tiktok blocks duplicate uploads, so I reversed the video to avoid the flag 🤣 Check out my Japanese channel if you want to see the unboxing 🇯🇵 #dji#djinano#djinanoactioncamera#actioncamera#reboxing
I just got ahold of the DJI NANO action camera. As my first action camera, I thought I would share my initial thoughts & impressions of it. This post is not sponsored by DJI, so I am sharing my own unbiased opinion.
Why now & why this specific model? There are several reasons. Firstly, as I have repeatedly warned, electronic prices have been trending upward. Even last-generation devices are being marked up rather than priced down as they are phased out like they used to be. It may be years before we see the type of price decreases that we use to as items were phased out. Additionally, there have been intensifying rumours of supply constraints specific to Japan in the form of import restrictions. Overall, I wanted to beat the market & get the NANO while I could before it gets marked up or otherwise becomes unavailable. As for why I got this specific model, already having the DJI Pocket 3 as well as my Samsung Flip 6, the reason is that it is compact & discreet in comparison to those. I primarily intend to use the NANO to shoot hands-free, utilising the included necklace attachment for easy point-of-view recording. I find that getting out my phone is intrusive since I have to hold it & draw attention to the fact that I am recording. Same with the DJI Pocket 3. For first-person-perspective shots with either of those devices, I need to carry around a chest harness mount then strap it on when I want to shoot. The result is much bulkier & ungainly, drawing undue attention to the fact that I am recording. Specific to my phone, I always worry that I might drop & seriously damage it in the process. As cool as they are, Samsung’s Flip series aren’t known for durability or ruggedness at all, & being without a phone for weeks due to an accident is not a position I wish to put myself in. With the NANO, I can easily wear it & nobody even knows that I’m recording. I also don’t have to worry that an accidental drop will cut me off from the world as it would with my phone. It is still a fairly large lens, so I think anybody paying attention would notice it immediately. I would not recommend it for 100% covert recording for that reason, but spying like that is not my intent. I simply want an unobtrusive, discreet way to record various events & attractions that I visit or overhead views of product unboxing/testing. At this point of what I suppose you would call my video career, it seems that the faceless videos I post get more traction than those of me talking. Maybe one day I will surpass this level, but in the meantime, I think this camera will give me a great edge in recording the types of videos that seem to perform best on my TikTok, YouTube, etc. Lastly, I am already somewhat locked into the DJI ecosystem, possessing not only the Pocket 3 but also the Mic 2. Therefore, buying another brand without the compatibility was less appealing than just sticking to something I was already familiar with & had both hardware/software for.
What Is the Performance Like?
So far, so good. I had been worried since numerous reports of overheating issues occurring within less than 10 minutes were rampant at release, but this does not seem to be the case with my model. Whether that is due to an upgrade of the hardware or firmware, I am not sure, but in my initial testing I got over 20 minutes shooting at maximum settings with no signs of overheating. Feeling safe, since I personally never record any longer than that, I cut off the overheat testing at that point to check out other features. I had initially mistaken the screen timeout for overheating. This occurred less than two minutes in, but after a slight bit of research, I realised all I needed to do was swipe right on the screen to set the timeout to “never” & the issue has not returned. I should also note that there is on-board memory capacity so, unlike the Pocket 3, you do not need an SD card before you can record anything. I opted for the 128GB, rather than the 64GB model, due to memory shortages being a driving force in global technology price increases. I tend to shoot everything in 1080p, but it is good to know that I have the 4K option there if I ever happen to want or need it. I do not think that we are at the point where most platforms fully welcome 4K, but since I am uploading to social media in an effort to become monetised, I do not think wasting space to have a 4K video that only anyone at my own home can see is worth the sacrifice. Just to mention the one real problem I’ve had so far, the DJI Mimo app not exporting my edited videos to my phone. The app will say that it is exported, but it does not appear in the DJI Exports album or anywhere else in my gallery. It takes several tries to push it through &, however many tries it takes, that many copies are pushed to the album when it finally does work (today, I had to push it through 7 times &, when it finally went through, I ended up with 7 copies of the same video). This is annoying & frustrating, but I cannot blame it on the NANO particularly since I am not sure if it is the camera, the Mimo app or even my phone itself. I intend to contact DJI support to see if they can provide some help with this.
Do I Recommend This Camera?
I do. Many reviews that I watched & read prior to making my own purchase warned that it is not a true action camera, but that is not my intended purpose anyway. I do not plan to take my NANO kayaking, rock-climbing or on a motorcycle (especially since I no longer have one). I simply want to use it for both event videos & product unboxing/review videos. If your intentions are the similar mine, I would definitely recommend it. A closed model such as the DJI Action series would likely be better for you if you are planning to partake in more extreme activities such as outdoor sports, etc.
As I mentioned above, prices may soon go up due to shortages of memory at an industrial scale &, if you are in Japan, additional import restrictions may further limit or cease availability. Therefore, I would advise getting it sooner rather than later.
Unless otherwise noted, image assets above are NOT original content & are shared under fair use doctrine with NO claims to authorship or ownership. Contact necrolicious@necrolicious.com for credit or removal.
This post was sponsored by…ME! If you’d like to support, please buy my original meme merch from Necrolicious.store or check out my affiliate links to get yourself some other cool things. Additional affiliate links may be contained in the above article. If you click on an affiliate link & sign up/make a purchase, I may earn a commission. This does not increase the price you pay for the product or service, so it helps support this website at no cost to you.
After more than half a century dedicated to investigating one of the world’s most enduring legends, Adrian Shine, the veteran naturalist & founder of The Loch Ness Project, has declared the Loch Ness Monster a myth. At 76, Shine has entered semi-retirement from active fieldwork, marking the end of an extraordinary chapter in the quest to understand the creature affectionately known as Nessie.
His conclusion comes not from frustration, but from a lifetime of rigorous, evidence-based scrutiny. Armed with sonar sweeps, submersibles, sediment analysis & collaborations with universities, Shine has explored the loch’s ecology & the psychology behind sightings. Recent advancements in technology – including high-resolution sonar, drones & environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling – have only reinforced his view: no large unknown vertebrate exists in the nutrient-poor depths of Loch Ness.
Yet the legend persists, fuelled by human perception, optical illusions & the enduring appeal of mystery. Shine’s work has illuminated the loch’s natural phenomena – boat wakes creating multi-humped waves, misidentified waterbirds & atmospheric refraction distorting distant objects – while explaining why so many “sightings” feel convincing.
The Ancient Origins of the Legend – Dispelling a Modern Myth
The story of a mysterious water beast in the Loch Ness area dates back far earlier than many assume. The earliest recorded account appears in the 7th-century Life of St. Columba by Adomnán, describing an event in 565 AD. Irish monk Saint Columba encountered locals burying a man killed by a ferocious “water beast” in the River Ness (the loch’s outflow). Columba commanded the creature to retreat, & it fled – a tale of saintly triumph over peril that fits medieval hagiographic traditions.
This predates the modern “Nessie” phenomenon by centuries. The 1930s brought widespread attention, sparked by a 1933 sighting & the infamous (later debunked) “Surgeon’s Photograph” hoax. But the idea of a large aquatic creature in the region is rooted in ancient Celtic folklore, including water spirits like kelpies.
A persistent rumour links the legend’s origins to occultist Aleister Crowley, who owned Boleskine House on the loch’s southeast shore from 1899. Crowley used the isolated property to attempt the lengthy Abramelin ritual (from The Book of the Sacred Magic of Abramelin the Mage), aiming to contact his Holy Guardian Angel. He abandoned it incomplete, leading to claims that unbound spirits or demons “created” or “unleashed” the monster.
This notion is a modern myth with no historical foundation. Sightings & folklore existed long before Crowley’s arrival (around 1900–1913), & the major Nessie boom occurred in 1933 – decades later. Crowley’s stay adds a layer of spooky intrigue, but it did not invent the legend.
A Passion Project, Not a Profession
Shine arrived at Loch Ness in 1973 as an amateur naturalist, initially drawn by tales of a fishing boat “attacked” by something mysterious. He founded The Loch Ness Project in the mid-1970s, shifting focus to scientific study of the loch’s environment rather than assuming a monster’s existence.
This was never a salaried “monster-hunting” role. It evolved into a dedicated, long-term pursuit supported by collaborations with academics, volunteers, media contributions & associations with the Loch Ness Centre (where he designed exhibitions & shared findings). Equipment like custom submersibles & sonar came through opportunistic funding & partnerships – a labour of curiosity about lake ecology & human perception, not a paid quest for Nessie.
Famous efforts include Operation Deepscan (1987), a massive sonar sweep with 24 boats. In recent years, as technology advanced, Shine embraced tools like eDNA (which detected abundant eels but no exotic large vertebrates) & drones. Paradoxically, these innovations have made the absence of a monster clearer, not easier to prove.
The loch’s cold, deep, nutrient-poor waters support limited biomass – insufficient for a large predator population. Sightings align with mundane explanations, & modern AI scrutiny dismisses many photos/videos as generated fakes.
Why the Myth Endures in the Age of Technology
Even today, with drones, 4K cameras & AI anomaly detection, definitive proof remains elusive. Should compelling evidence emerge, the immediate response would likely include cries of “AI!” – a credibility crisis born from hyper-realistic deepfakes.
Shine remains open to new data but concludes the evidence points to myth. His semi-retirement reflects age & the weight of accumulated findings, shifting focus to reflection, writing (including a 2024 book on sea serpents) & education. A few online commentators have playfully suggested that Shine’s declaration is itself part of a cover-up – that he finally discovered the creature & now calls it a myth to shield it from further intrusion. While such theories add to the fun of the legend, they overlook the transparent, evidence-driven nature of his 52-year investigation. Shine has consistently shared his methods, collaborated openly with scientists, & welcomed new data that might overturn his conclusions.
“You cannot kill a legend with science,” Shine has noted.
Unless otherwise noted, image assets above are NOT original content & are shared under fair use doctrine with NO claims to authorship or ownership. Contact necrolicious@necrolicious.com for credit or removal.
This post was sponsored by…ME! If you’d like to support, please buy my original meme merch from Necrolicious.store or check out my affiliate links to get yourself some other cool things. Additional affiliate links may be contained in the above article. If you click on an affiliate link & sign up/make a purchase, I may earn a commission. This does not increase the price you pay for the product or service, so it helps support this website at no cost to you.
Samsung showcased its Brain Health feature at CES, aiming to use data from Galaxy Watches, Rings & smartphones to detect subtle early signs of cognitive decline potentially linked to dementia. While this represents an ambitious extension of wearable health monitoring, questions remain about its real-world accuracy, potential for errors & broader implications for privacy & user wellbeing.
How the Brain Health Feature Operates
The tool passively analyses sensor data, including:
Gait patterns (walking stability)
Voice changes (e.g., speech pace during interactions)
Sleep quality & disruptions
Typing rhythm & daily patterns
AI compares these against a personalised baseline & flags deviations associated with early cognitive changes. Notifications are intended to be supportive, urging medical consultation & suggesting brain-training exercises via the Samsung Health app. Caregivers may also receive alerts.
Samsung stresses that this is not a diagnostic tool—merely a prompt for professional assessment. In-house development is complete, with ongoing clinical validation trials in collaboration with medical partners. Public availability remains uncertain, potentially starting as a beta in select regions later in 2026 or beyond.
Potential Benefits & the Focus on Dementia
Dementia impacts over 55 million people globally, with early indicators like gait instability, voice alterations & sleep issues potentially appearing years ahead. Research on wearables supports these as viable digital biomarkers, with studies showing promising accuracy in distinguishing mild cognitive impairment from normal ageing.
Early flagging could enable lifestyle interventions or treatments to slow progression in reversible stages. Samsung targets older adults, building on established physical health tracking to address neurological concerns.
However, overlaps with other forms of mental illness such as schizophrenia exist. Furthermore, schizophrenia slightly elevates later dementia risk. However, Samsung’s age-focused patterns are unlikely to detect schizophrenia in younger users, potentially leading to missed or mismatched alerts.
Dementia Versus Schizophrenia: Key Distinctions & Limited Overlaps
Aspect
Dementia
Schizophrenia
Nature
Progressive neurodegenerative condition
Chronic psychiatric disorder
Typical Onset
65+ years
Late teens to early 30s
Core Symptoms
Memory loss, confusion, impaired judgement
Hallucinations, delusions, disorganised thinking
Progression
Worsens irreversibly over time
Fluctuates; manageable with treatment
Causes
Brain cell loss (e.g., Alzheimer’s, strokes)
Genetic, neurochemical & environmental factors
Accuracy Concerns & Risks of Errors
While foundational research on gait, voice & sleep biomarkers shows potential (e.g., accuracies up to 90% in controlled studies), consumer AI applications face challenges. False positives—flagging normal variations (stress, illness, ageing) as decline—could cause undue anxiety. False negatives might delay genuine concerns.
Broader AI dementia tools highlight overdiagnosis risks, especially in older adults where symptoms overlap with normal ageing. Critics note that without full validation results, trusting device alerts for sensitive health decisions remains premature. Extreme outcomes, like unwarranted institutionalisation from misinterpreted data, are unlikely but underscore the need for caution—alerts are advisory only.
Privacy Implications
Constant monitoring of intimate behaviours (voice, movement, sleep) intensifies privacy debates. Samsung commits to on-device processing & Knox security, avoiding cloud uploads for these metrics.
Yet concerns persist: potential device syncing, future integrations or breaches could expose highly personal data. Opt-in controls are essential, but the sensitivity of cognitive insights demands rigorous oversight.
Final Reflections
Samsung’s Brain Health highlights wearables’ evolving role in preventative care, yet its effectiveness hinges on forthcoming trial data proving reliability while minimising harms. For a condition as complex as dementia, technology should complement—not replace—professional evaluation.
Would you allow your devices to monitor for cognitive indicators if it might enable earlier intervention, or does the risk of inaccuracy & privacy intrusion outweigh the benefits? Share your thoughts in the comments.
Unless otherwise noted, image assets above are NOT original content & are shared under fair use doctrine with NO claims to authorship or ownership. Contact necrolicious@necrolicious.com for credit or removal.
This post was sponsored by…ME! If you’d like to support, please buy my original meme merch from Necrolicious.store or check out my affiliate links to get yourself some other cool things. Additional affiliate links may be contained in the above article. If you click on an affiliate link & sign up/make a purchase, I may earn a commission. This does not increase the price you pay for the product or service, so it helps support this website at no cost to you.
2026年を迎え、テクノロジーファンの間ではAppleのiPhone 18の発売に関する憶測が飛び交っています。報道によると、期待されていた発売は今年中に行われない可能性があり、その原因としてChatGPTのサム・アルトマン氏によるDRAM（ダイナミック・ランダム・アクセス・メモリ）の深刻な不足が挙げられています。この記事では、この供給不足がAppleの発売スケジュールに及ぼす潜在的な影響を検証するとともに、Galaxy Z TriFold（ロール式スマートフォン）、AI搭載スマートグラスなど、2026年に発売予定の野心的な製品パイプラインを維持できるSamsungの能力と対比させています。
対照的に、SamsungはDRAM不足にも動じることなく、2026年には堅調なリリーススケジュールを組んでいます。同社は、先駆的なトリプルスクリーンスマートフォン「Galaxy Z TriFold」に加え、ロール式スマートフォンとAI搭載スマートグラスを発表する予定です。この回復力は、報道されている銀鉱山の生産量を先行購入することなど、Samsungの先見性のある戦略によるものと考えられます。この戦略により、Samsungは多額の費用を節約し、DRAM価格の上昇にもかかわらず重要な部品を確保することができたと報じられています。早期に供給を確保することで、Samsungは通常のリリースサイクルを維持し、競合他社に対する競争優位性を確立しています。
しかし、Galaxy Z TriFoldはニッチ製品として販売されており、韓国メディアThe Bellは、Samsungが1台あたり損失を出している可能性があると報じています。韓国で約2,500ポンドで販売されているTriFoldは、ロスリーダーとして販売されています。これは、目先の利益を追求するのではなく、市場での存在感を確立し、消費者のフィードバックを集めるための戦略です。この戦略は財政的には厳しいものの、Samsungのイノベーションへのコミットメントと、長期的な利益のために短期的な損失を吸収する意欲を強調しています。この点については、Android Authorityが最近の記事で詳しく取り上げています。
As 2026 begins, technology enthusiasts are abuzz with speculation about Apple’s forthcoming iPhone 18 release. Reports suggest that the anticipated launch may not occur this year, with a significant DRAM (Dynamic Random Access Memory) shortage caused by Sam Altman of ChatGPT identified as the likely cause. This article examines the potential impact of this supply constraint on Apple’s release schedule, while contrasting Samsung’s apparent ability to sustain its ambitious product pipeline, including the Galaxy Z TriFold, a rollable phone, & AI-powered smart glasses—all slated for release in 2026.
The DRAM Shortage: A Challenge for Apple’s iPhone 18
Recent analyses, including data from IntuitionLabs & IDC’s 2026 market overview, highlight a global DRAM shortage that escalated in 2025 by ChatGPT/OpenAI purchasing 40% of the world’s supply. This scarcity arises from manufacturers such as Samsung & SK hynix reallocating silicon wafer capacity to meet the surging demand for high-bandwidth memory (HBM) utilised in AI data centres. The price of 16Gb DDR5 chips reportedly rose from $6.84 to $27.20 in the fourth quarter of 2025 alone, exerting considerable pressure on smartphone production. Given Apple’s reliance on integrated LPDDR memory within its system-on-chip (SoC) designs, this shortage could disrupt the timely production of the iPhone 18.
Industry insiders propose that Apple may have postponed the base iPhone 18 launch from its traditional autumn slot to spring 2027, aligning with a strategic shift to stagger releases. This approach, detailed by MacRumors, aims to manage an expanding product lineup—including the iPhone 17e, 18 Pro, & a potential foldable model—while avoiding sales overlap & easing production pressures. If the DRAM shortage is indeed the driving factor, Apple’s decision reflects a pragmatic response to ensure quality & availability, marking a potential departure from its long-standing annual release cycle for the first time.
Samsung’s Unwavering Pipeline: A Tale of Strategic Planning
In contrast, Samsung appears undeterred by the DRAM shortage, with a robust release schedule for 2026. The company is set to unveil the Galaxy Z TriFold, a pioneering triple-screen smartphone, alongside a rollable phone & AI-enhanced smart glasses. This resilience may be attributed to Samsung’s forward-thinking strategy, including the reported advance purchase of silver mine output. This move has reportedly saved Samsung a substantial amount of money, enabling it to secure critical components despite the DRAM price increase. By locking in supplies early, Samsung has positioned itself to maintain its normal release cadence, showcasing a competitive edge over its rivals.
However, it is worth noting that the Galaxy Z TriFold is marketed as a niche product, with Korean outlet The Bell reporting that Samsung may be selling each unit at a loss. Priced at approximately £2,500 in South Korea, the TriFold serves as a loss leader, a tactic designed to establish market presence & gather consumer feedback rather than generate immediate profit. This strategy, while financially challenging, underscores Samsung’s commitment to innovation & its willingness to absorb short-term losses for long-term gains—a topic explored in greater depth by Android Authority in a recent article.
Comparative Insights & Future Implications
The divergent approaches of Apple & Samsung highlight differing priorities amid global supply constraints. Apple’s decision to potentially delay the iPhone 18 suggests a cautious stance, prioritising stability & customer satisfaction over adhering to a rigid timeline. Meanwhile, Samsung’s aggressive expansion into foldable, rollable, & wearable technologies demonstrates a bold investment in diversification, bolstered by strategic resource procurement.
For consumers, these developments signal a shifting landscape in the smartphone market. Apple’s extended wait for the iPhone 18 may disappoint fans accustomed to annual upgrades, yet it could result in a more refined product. Samsung’s multi-device rollout, conversely, offers immediate access to cutting-edge technology, albeit at a premium cost. As DRAM prices are projected to remain elevated until new fabrication plants come online in 2027–2028, both companies’ strategies will likely evolve, influencing pricing & innovation trajectories in the years ahead.
The speculated delay of the iPhone 18, driven by the 2025 DRAM shortage, underscores the complexities of modern tech manufacturing. Apple’s staggered release plan reflects a measured response to these challenges, while Samsung’s continued momentum—supported by strategic resource acquisitions—positions it as a formidable competitor. As the industry navigates this period of scarcity, consumers & analysts alike will observe closely to see how these giants adapt, with the outcomes shaping the future of mobile technology.
Unless otherwise noted, image assets above are NOT original content & are shared under fair use doctrine with NO claims to authorship or ownership. Contact necrolicious@necrolicious.com for credit or removal.
This post was sponsored by…ME! If you’d like to support, please buy my original meme merch from Necrolicious.store or check out my affiliate links to get yourself some other cool things. Additional affiliate links may be contained in the above article. If you click on an affiliate link & sign up/make a purchase, I may earn a commission. This does not increase the price you pay for the product or service, so it helps support this website at no cost to you.
