After Purportedly Retiring in December 2025, Legendary Tekken Director Katsuhiro Harada is Back in the Game with New SNK-Affiliated Studio

@necroliciouseng

After Purportedly Retiring in December 2025, Legendary Tekken Director Katsuhiro Harada is Back in the Game with New SNK-Affiliated Studio #tekken #fgc #bandainamco #snk #creatorsearchinsights

♬ オリジナル楽曲 – Necrolicious.com ENG🇺🇲🇬🇧 – Necrolicious.com ENG🇺🇲🇬🇧

When Katsuhiro Harada announced his departure from Bandai Namco at the end of 2025 many in the fighting game community assumed the legendary Tekken director was leaving the industry entirely. The tone of his statement — marked by personal reflection & the recent death of his long-time rival & friend Tomonobu Itagaki — suggested a moment of life reassessment rather than a simple job change. Yet on 12 May 2026 Harada surprised everyone by revealing VS Studio SNK a new independent studio fully supported by SNK Corporation. The announcement has ignited fresh discussion about creative autonomy corporate pressures & the enduring appeal of traditional Japanese fighting game design.

This article integrates Harada’s official statements the personal context surrounding his exit SNK’s ownership structure the community response & realistic expectations for the new venture. Drawing on the May 2026 announcement video SNK press releases Harada’s December 2025 farewell post & verified social media sentiment it provides a balanced authoritative overview for enthusiasts & industry observers.

Harada’s Official Announcement & Studio Vision

In a video posted to the official SNK YouTube channel on 12 May 2026 Harada introduced VS Studio SNK Co Ltd established on 1 May 2026 in Shinagawa-ku Tokyo. The studio receives full financial & operational backing from SNK yet maintains independence to pursue original projects & potential collaborations with SNK intellectual properties.

Harada outlined the studio philosophy as “Beyond tradition crafted to perfection.” He stressed the importance of “a free & open environment with room to breathe” where developers could concentrate solely on game creation without the frequent executive turnover or short-term revenue priorities he encountered at Bandai Namco. The name VS carries layered meanings — Video game Soft Versus Visionary Standard Volition Shift & Vanguard Spirit — each reflecting a commitment to challenging industry norms while preserving the competitive spirit of fighting games.

Harada highlighted long-time collaborator Yuichi Yoneshige as part of the core team & issued an open hiring call for talented developers who share the vision. SNK executive Yasuyuki Oda welcomed the partnership describing Harada as a respected friend & rival.

Harada’s Stated Reasons & the Subtext of Independence

In the official announcement & accompanying press release, Harada emphasised creative autonomy. He described VS Studio SNK as an entity dedicated to “beyond tradition, crafted to perfection,” where technology & imagination could flourish without the frequent executive turnover & short-term revenue focus he experienced at Bandai Namco. He highlighted SNK’s long-term vision & strong support base as ideal for building something lasting.

Fans, however, read between the lines. The phrase “free & open environment with room to breathe” stands in direct contrast to the restrictive corporate culture many attribute to Bandai Namco’s recent output. Tekken 8 faced widespread criticism for toned-down female character designs, including broader shoulders & reduced curves in certain outfits. Subsequent patches adjusted “chest parameters,” yet the initial changes fuelled ongoing debate about external influence on creative decisions.

The Dragon Quest Precedent: Japanese Creators Push Back

This is not an isolated incident. In 2024 Square Enix’s Dragon Quest III HD-2D Remake team, under series creator Yuji Horii, openly criticised the shift from “male/female” protagonist options to neutral “Type 1/Type 2” labels. Horii questioned why Western regulations & American influence required such sanitised language, asking who would object to straightforward male & female terminology. Clips of the interview were quickly removed or edited by official channels, prompting accusations of damage control.

The episode illustrated two dynamics at play. First, a small but vocal minority of online activists can generate sufficient pressure to force corporate self-censorship. Second, & more significantly, institutional investors exert structural influence through environmental, social & governance (ESG) scoring systems. BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager with US$9.42 trillion in assets under management as of June 2023, has been at the forefront of these initiatives.A widely circulated infographic details BlackRock’s founding partners & highlights its advocacy for LGBT+ equality & inclusion, boardroom diversity targets & “social responsibility” frameworks. The firm has pressed portfolio companies on climate issues, lobbying & gender diversity, with rabidly zionist CEO Larry Fink publicly committing to these priorities in multiple statements. While BlackRock has scaled back some aspirational DEI goals in 2025 “amid shifting market conditions”” — more likely because they became the obvious source of the majority wokeness — its historical role in shaping corporate behaviour remains a focal point for critics of industry-wide changes. CEO Larry Fink is unabashedly pro-israel. That should tell everyone everything they need to know.

(((BlackRock))), ESG Scores & the Gaming Industry

Every Single Aspect of BlackRock is jewish

BlackRock manages stakes in virtually every major Japanese publisher, including Bandai Namco, Square Enix, Capcom, Sony & Nintendo. Its influence operates through proxy voting, ESG ratings & capital allocation that reward companies meeting diversity, equity & inclusion metrics. In practice this has translated to character redesigns that reduce feminine features of female characters up to the point of total erasure (like Body Types 1 & 2 above), roster engineering that prioritises Afrocentric representation over lore consistency & marketing that avoids “problematic” traditional Japanese aesthetics. Many observers argue these policies diminish the very elements that made Japanese games globally appealing to begin with: stylised, unapologetic fanservice & heroic archetypes rooted in Japanese pop culture. The result is a form of censorship that prioritises (((western))) regulatory & (((investor))) preferences over the creative instincts of Japanese studios.

Circling back to Horii’s original question, “Who wants this?” the answer is clearly jews — the group that wants to sneak-genocide everyone born outside of the jewish race.

Woke (((BlackRock))) mandates are simply an extension of that.

Page of quotes from the jews' secret bible, the talmud. Quote stating that the birthrate of non-jews must be diminished highlighted.

SNK’s Reputation for Design Freedom & Fanservice

SNK has long maintained a distinctive approach to character aesthetics that contrasts with redesign controversies at some other publishers. Iconic figures such as Mai Shiranui retain the stylised exaggerated proportions & revealing outfits that have defined the King of Fighters & Fatal Fury series since the 1990s. Recent releases including Fatal Fury: City of the Wolves & Samurai Shodown show no pattern of the breast-reduction or masculinisation complaints that arose in certain Tekken 8 discussions.

While platform-level regional adjustments have occasionally occurred for Western storefronts SNK itself has consistently promoted uncensored artwork & embraced its heritage of playful fanservice. This track record makes the studio an attractive partner for Harada who has historically responded to player feedback on design elements without imposing top-down restrictions.

A parallel example from 2024 illustrates broader industry tensions. Square Enix’s Dragon Quest III HD-2D Remake saw series creator Yuji Horii publicly criticise the replacement of “male & female” protagonist options with neutral “Type 1 & Type 2” labels attributing the change to Western regulatory & market expectations. Clips of his remarks were later edited or removed from official channels highlighting the ongoing balance between creative intent & corporate caution. Harada’s alignment with SNK positions him outside such constraints while preserving the anime-inspired visual language that Japanese fighting games have historically celebrated.

Saudi Ownership of SNK & Business Implications

Since 2022 SNK has operated under majority ownership by Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund a sovereign wealth vehicle that has supplied capital for expansion & global growth. The arrangement has enabled projects such as celebrity collaborations in Fatal Fury: City of the Wolves without apparent interference in core creative decisions. To date SNK’s output continues to reflect its traditional aesthetic suggesting the investment prioritises commercial scalability over content mandates.

For Harada this backing provides resources & stability in a more agile structure than the layered bureaucracy of larger conglomerates. Early indications point to potential crossovers that could blend Tekken’s 3D mechanical depth with SNK’s 2D heritage offering fans a compelling fusion of styles.

Fighting Game Community Reaction on Social Media & Forums

Except for jews, who are big mad they’ve been found out & curved, the announcement generated immediate positive engagement across social media. Users expressed relief at Harada securing genuine creative freedom & excitement over the prospect of new high-quality titles unencumbered by previous corporate limitations. Discussions frequently reference his past comments on executive priorities & celebrate the alignment with SNK’s design philosophy.

While Saudi ownership occasionally prompts light-hearted memes or questions about external influence, the prevailing sentiment remains optimistic. The community largely views the move as a net positive for the genre rather than a geopolitical development.

Historical Context: Creative Autonomy in Japanese Game Development

Japanese developers have repeatedly navigated the tension between artistic vision & global commercial demands. From the arcade boom of the 1980s & 1990s — when Tekken & King of Fighters first built their worldwide followings — to the modern console & PC era creators such as Harada & Horii have advocated for fidelity to their original concepts. Cultural context is key: Japanese fighting games often embrace stylised fantasy & exaggerated aesthetics that resonate domestically even as publishers adapt for international markets.

Harada’s career embodies this balance. He guided Tekken from its humble origins to its worldwide dominance while incorporating community input on balance & representation. His establishment of VS Studio SNK echoes earlier veteran moves toward greater control reinforcing a pattern where proven talent seeks environments that value long-term passion over sneakily decreasing the “filthy goyim” birthrate by endlessly injecting LGBT propaganda into all media.

My Position in All of This

My number one preference is for Japanese game developers to develop their games from a Japanese perspective with a Japanese audience in mind, not prioritising (((global))) or (((western))) audiences. However, with Japan’s economy being in the position that it has been forced into, the types of buyouts described in this article are unfortunately all too common. In such an environment, whatever foreign country/corporation that buys out studio ownership with the intent of preserving Japan and its culture is infinitely better than any (((country)))/(((corporation)))) that simply sees Japanese media as a means to drive covertly genocidal messaging to the world through ESG/DEI mandates that fuel wokeness.

In light of this, I am proud of Harada for making this move & fully support him, whatever his reasoning may be. I think it’s entirely possible that his reasoning might not be political at all, but the overlap between all of the issues is undeniable & this story breaking provided a good chance to discuss this.

As a life long fan, I wish Harada great success with his new venture.

Practical Takeaways for Fans & Aspiring Developers

  1. Provide constructive feedback when invited as Harada has demonstrated responsiveness to player input in prior titles.
  2. Support studios that prioritise design freedom through purchases & positive engagement helping sustain environments that favour traditional Japanese aesthetics.
  3. Recognise that creative independence operates within commercial realities: even independent studios require funding & audience interest to thrive.

For developers, Harada’s path illustrates that extensive experience & reputation can open doors to new ventures. The studio’s inclusive hiring approach including openness to talent over 50 underscores the value placed on institutional knowledge.

Balanced Analysis: Business Realities & Creative Potential

Harada’s transition highlights a recurring industry pattern where seasoned creators pursue smaller more focused structures to realise long-held visions. SNK’s Saudi-backed model offers financial stability without evident artistic restrictions a combination that could prove advantageous for producing enduring fighting games.

The market remains competitive with established franchises competing for attention. Success for VS Studio SNK will hinge on execution quality community engagement & the ability to deliver distinctive player-versus-player experiences. Overall the announcement provides genuine optimism for enthusiasts who value thoughtful design & passionate development over rapid monetisation.

Further Reading

For more on gaming industry shifts see Nintendo Switch 2 Price Increase: How ChatGPT & the DRAM Shortage Are Driving Worldwide Electronics Costs Higher.
Explore creative influences in LEGO Batman: Legacy of the Dark Knight – Arkham Inspiration Release Details & Everything Fans Need to Know.
For Japanese media nuances read Looney Tunes Gets the Silent Treatment in Japan.
Stay updated via the Necrolicious homepage.

FAQ

Did Harada cite Tomonobu Itagaki’s death as a factor in his reflections?
Yes. Harada referenced the loss of colleagues including Itagaki as part of his personal reassessment of the time remaining for creative work.

Was Harada initially thought to be retiring from games?
Yes. His December 2025 statement led many to assume a full exit from the industry until the VS Studio SNK announcement clarified otherwise.

What was the DJ mix released after his departure?
Harada produced TEKKEN: A 30-Year Journey – Harada’s Final Mix a 60-minute nonstop edit he described as his first & last such project serving as a personal farewell to the Tekken era at Bandai Namco.

Does SNK enforce restrictive design policies?
No recent evidence indicates SNK imposes redesign mandates or ideological guidelines. The studio continues to support its signature stylised character designs.

What can fans expect from VS Studio SNK?
Early signals suggest original fighting games & potential crossovers with SNK franchises delivered with Tekken-level polish & a focus on long-term quality.

Necrolicious “Necro Licious” Funny Vampire Fangs Lips Meme 100% Cotton Unisex Tee
Buy on Printify

Unless otherwise noted, image assets above are NOT original content & are shared under fair use doctrine with NO claims to authorship or ownership.
Contact necrolicious@necrolicious.com for credit or removal.

This post was sponsored by…ME! If you’d like to support, please buy my original meme merchandise or check out my affiliate links to get yourself some other cool things. Additional affiliate links may be contained in the above article. If you click on an affiliate link & sign up/make a purchase, I may earn a commission. This does not increase the price you pay for the product or service, so it helps support this website at no cost to you.

Share this:

Ignoring Millennia of Turkish Rule of Palestine & DNA Studies, Crackpot Candace Owens Claims Modern jews Are Turks in Disguise

Apparently having no knowledge of the Ottoman Empire or World War I nor how its end led to us Turks losing the land israel now occupies after millennia, Candace Owens, Sneako & their braindead followers argue that Turkic origin explains the historical & contemporary evil machinations of what they call “fake jews.” However, a thorough examination of genetic, historical & even base logical evidence reveals the hypothesis to be fundamentally flawed. jews are jews & there are no “fake jews” Turks. This article explores these facets in detail, drawing on scholarly studies & documented timelines to provide a comprehensive rebuttal.

Genetic Evidence: No Trace of Khazar Ancestry

Central to debunking the Khazar hypothesis is the robust body of genetic research that consistently affirms the Middle Eastern origins of ashkenazi jews. A pivotal study in this regard is the 2013 genome-wide analysis published in Human Biology, co-authored by Michael Hammer of the University of Arizona. This research compared DNA samples from ashkenazi jews with populations from the Caucasus region, which serves as a proxy for potential Khazar descendants due to the historical location of the Khazar Khaganate. The findings were unequivocal: no detectable genetic similarity exists between ashkenazi jews & these groups.

Instead, the study confirmed that ashkenazi paternal lineages trace back to the Levant (the ancient Near East), while maternal lineages show European admixture, likely from conversions & intermarriages during the diaspora. This aligns with broader consensus in population genetics, as seen in works like Harry Ostrer’s 2012 book Legacy: A Genetic History of the jewish People, which emphasises continuity from ancient Levantine populations. Fringe claims, such as those in Eran Elhaik’s 2013 paper suggesting partial Khazar origins, have been widely critiqued for methodological flaws & contradicted by larger datasets. For instance, a 2010 Nature study by Behar et al. further supports negligible Turkic or Central Asian input, underscoring that ashkenazi jews share genetic markers with other jewish groups, including sephardic & mizrahi jews, far more than with any Turkic peoples.

Historical Expulsions: A Pattern Predating Khazar Conversion

A particularly compelling critique of the Khazar hypothesis comes from historical records of Jewish expulsions, which demonstrate conflicts & patterns long before any purported Khazar influence. In a widely shared X post by @BasedSamParker, the author meticulously breaks down over 1,000 documented expulsions spanning millennia, arguing that attributing tensions solely to subgroups like “Khazarians,” “Talmudists,” “Sabbateans,” “Frankists,” or “Zionists” overlooks deeper, persistent dynamics. Parker’s analysis is exhaustive: 143 expulsions occurred before the Talmud’s compilation around AD 500; 181 predated the alleged Khazar conversion in AD 740–800; 602 before Sabbateanism in AD 1665; 679 before Frankism in AD 1755; & 752 before modern Zionism in 1897.

Have you ever heard a version of the following: “They aren’t real jews, they’re [Khazarians/Frankists/Satanists/etc]”

Such a take simply ignores the full scope of history. So let’s look at these assertions through the lens of jewish expulsions throughout history:

▪️”It’s the Talmudists” (ca AD 500)
There were 143 expulsions of jews before the publication of the Talmud. If it were just the Talmud that was the problem, how do we account for those prior expulsions?

▪️”It’s the Khazarians” (ca AD 800)
From their flight out of Egypt until AD 800 when the alleged mythical Khazarian conversion happened, there were 181 jewish expulsions (143 before the Talmud’s publication and 38 afterward). If the problem is the “Khazarians,” how do we account for those 181 expulsions?

▪️”It’s the Sabbateans” (ca AD 1665)
There were another 421 expulsions after the alleged mythical Khazarian conversion, but prior to the rise of the Sabbateans. Making 602 total before Sabbateanism. How do we account for those?

▪️”It’s the Frankists” (ca AD 1755)
There were 77 more expulsions after the rise of Sabbateanism but before the creation of Frankism. That makes 679 before Frankism, so how do we account for those?

▪️”It’s the zionists” (ca AD 1897)
There were 73 expulsions after the rise of Frankism but before the establishment of zionism in 1897. That’s 752 total jewish expulsions prior to the rise of zionism. How do we account for those if the problem is just “zionism?”

Other major jewish groups & movements have overlapped those time periods above: Babylonian exiles, Samaritans, Hellenized jews, pharisees, sadducees, zealots, rabbinic judaism, zohar/kaballah, illuminati, Bolshevism, etc.

▪️Atheist Bolshevik jews: emerged prominently with the Russian Revolutions, 1905-1925
▪️Illuminati: founded 1776
▪️Frankists: established around 1755
▪️Sabbateans: established around 1665
▪️Zohar: first published around AD 1280–1290
▪️Kabbalah: began to take shape around the 12th–13th centuries, c. 1100s–1200s AD
▪️Alleged Khazars Conversion To judaism: allegedly occurred starting around AD 740-800
▪️Talmud judaism: talmud completed c. 400–600 AD
▪️Rabbinic judaism: began to take shape around the 1st century AD, solidified c. 70–200 AD. Led to full talmudic judaism.
▪️Zealots/Sadducees/Pharisees, ca 1st Century AD
▪️Edomites’ Conversion to judaism: occurred 125–110 BC
▪️Hellenized jews: emerged by the 3rd century BC (c. 300–200 BC)
▪️Samaritan jews (distinct identity): began to form around 722 BC (solidified c. 500–400 BC)
▪️Babylonian Exiles (black magic/usury skills): c. 597–539 BC

It doesn’t matter the period of history: there’s always something going on within the tribe of people who now call themselves jews—and it’s always leading to them being expelled. One revolutionary, subversive, or supremacist movement after another.

Laying blame at the feet of only one of these movements ignores the long arc of history. These people have had problems with their neighbors for a long time.

Who are the “real” jеws now & who are the “fake” ones? Who knows! Are any of them real or fake? Different factions of jews tell different stories–accusing some factions of being fake & claiming the mantle of authenticity for themselves: “zionists aren’t real jews,” or “Sabbateans aren’t real jews,” or “those are Talmudists, they aren’t real jews,” or “The ADL isn’t actually jewish,” etc etc etc. Whenever there’s a problematic or unpopular jewish movement, the rest of jewry “disavows” them: “They’re not real jews.” And often tries to offload the blame onto some Gentiles.

But at this moment in time, they all seem to band together with each other against the rest of us–and it’s been this way for millennia. No matter which time frame you choose, jеws were having problems getting along with non-jews. 3000 years ago or 3 years ago, that’s remained consistent.

Whatever they are; whoever they are; wherever they come from; whatever you call them–they call themselves jews, and they can’t seem to get along with the rest of us.

Drawing from sources such as Paul Johnson’s A History of the jews & compilations on jewishVirtualLibrary.org, Parker illustrates how these events reflect overlapping influences, including Edomite conversions around 125–110 BC, Babylonian exiles from 597–539 BC, & Kabbalah’s emergence in the 1100s–1200s AD. He dismisses attempts to scapegoat specific sects as deflection, noting that self-identified jews have historically united against non-jews, as evidenced in ancient texts like Flavius Josephus’ Antiquities of the jews. This timeline not only predates Khazar involvement but also challenges the notion of a fabricated Turkic identity, as expulsions from places like ancient Egypt to medieval Europe occurred without any Central Asian context.

Parker’s post stands out for its rigorous use of historical data to refute subgroup narratives, emphasising that the Khazar theory serves as a convenient excuse to ignore broader patterns of perceived subversion or supremacism. For those researching “jewish expulsions history” or “Khazar myth origins,” this perspective provides a grounded counterpoint to conspiracy-driven claims, reinforcing that the hypothesis fails to account for millennia of documented interactions.

The Ottoman Empire: Logical Inconsistencies in the Khazar Narrative

The dissolution of the Ottoman Empire offers one of the most glaring logical flaws in the Khazar hypothesis, particularly when considering the land now occupied by israel. For centuries, Ottoman Turks ruled Palestine as part of our vast empire that endured until the end of World War I in 1918. If ashkenazi jews were truly ethnic Turks descended from Khazars, there would have been no impetus for them to infiltrate & sabotage our empire to seize control of the region. Such actions would amount to Turks undermining our own dominion, a self-defeating endeavour akin to someone bombing their own house to get their own food from their own refrigerator. Historical records show zionist movements & external pressures contributing to the empire’s fall, leading to the British Mandate & eventual establishment of israel, but these were driven by jewish nationalist aspirations rooted in ancient israelite claims. The absence of any affinity or alliance with the Ottomans—despite shared “Turkic” origins under Khazar theory—exposes the hypothesis as historically incoherent, as jews resisted Ottoman rule rather than embracing it as compatriots.

  • Ottoman Control Over Palestine for Centuries: The Ottoman Empire, established in the late 13th century, expanded to include Palestine by 1516 under Sultan Selim I, maintaining dominion over the region for over four centuries until 1918. This period saw Palestine as an integral part of Ottoman territories, governed through vilayets (provinces) & subject to Turkish administrative & legal systems, with no significant challenges from purported “Khazarian” jews who, if ethnically Turkic, would logically have integrated rather than opposed the regime.
  • World War I & the Empire’s Dissolution: The Ottoman Empire allied with the Central Powers during World War I (1914–1918), facing defeats in key campaigns such as the Arab Revolt (1916–1918, supported by British forces) & the Sinai & Palestine Campaign (1915–1918). These military setbacks, compounded by internal nationalist movements & economic strain, led to the empire’s fragmentation via the Armistice of Mudros in October 1918 & subsequent treaties like the Treaty of Sèvres (1920), which partitioned Ottoman lands & ended Turkish sovereignty over Palestine.
  • The Balfour Declaration & British Mandate: Issued on 2 November 1917 by British Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour, this declaration expressed support for “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the jewish people,” amid the ongoing war & as British forces advanced into Ottoman-held territories (e.g., the capture of jerusalem in December 1917). It paved the way for the League of Nations to grant Britain the Mandate for Palestine in 1920, effectively transferring control from the defeated Ottomans to British administration, which facilitated increased Jewish immigration & set the stage for the 1948 establishment of Israel—actions that proponents of the Khazar theory illogically attribute to “Turkic” jews wresting land from their own ethnicity.
  • zionist Infiltration & Sabotage Claims in Context: Historical narratives often highlight zionist diplomacy & alliances with Britain (e.g., through figures like Chaim Weizmann) as contributing to Ottoman decline, but under the Khazar hypothesis, such “infiltration” becomes absurd: why would ethnic Turks sabotage a Turkish empire to claim Palestinian land already under their broader ethnic control? This contradiction underscores the theory’s failure, as real motivations stemmed from religious & historical ties to ancient israel, not fabricated Turkic origins.

Deflection Tactics: Shifting Blame from Core Doctrines

A recurring theme in critiques of the Khazar hypothesis is its role as a deflection, serving only to redirect scrutiny away from judaism & jewry. This tactic, often employed by christians, avoids addressing fallacies in their own religious doctrines or historical behaviours by framing issues as the work of “fake” jews with Turkic roots or “fake” jews worshipping Baal, Moloch, Satan or any other cope they can think of instead of rebuking all judeo aspects of themselves. However, as genetic & historical evidence shows, such theories lack substantiation & instead perpetuate myths that contradict genuine data. They ignore comprehensive DNA data & have been dismissed by mainstream historians for selective interpretations. By emphasising “Khazarian Turks,” proponents deflect blame, but this only underscores the hypothesis’s weakness when confronted with facts.

Conclusion: Towards Evidence-Based Understanding

The Khazar hypothesis is completely bunk. Genetic studies from institutions like the University of Arizona, detailed expulsion timelines as outlined by Parker, & logical analyses of events like the Ottoman Empire’s fall all converge to debunk any substantive links between jews & Turks. For those exploring “debunking Khazar theory” or “jewish genetic history,” prioritising peer-reviewed sources over social media narratives is essential. Blacks are generally not known for intellectual acumen, but allow one to speak & they will spread dangerous misinformation such as this, whether intentionally or not. It’s well known that every single AI video fools them. That this repeatedly debunked claim even reared its goofy face again is a testament to the dangers of giving a monkey like Candace a platform in the first place. She should be deported back to Africa for this.

Unless otherwise noted, image assets above are NOT original content & are shared under fair use doctrine with NO claims to authorship or ownership.
Contact necrolicious@necrolicious.com for credit or removal.

This post was sponsored by…ME! If you’d like to support, please buy my original meme merchandise or check out my affiliate links to get yourself some other cool things. Additional affiliate links may be contained in the above article. If you click on an affiliate link & sign up/make a purchase, I may earn a commission. This does not increase the price you pay for the product or service, so it helps support this website at no cost to you.

Share this: