Spotify—the global music streaming giant—faces an unprecedented crisis. With a reported $1.33 billion profit in 2024, CEO Daniel Ek diverted $702 million to Helsing, a defence tech firm developing AI-powered weaponry. Allegations of ties to israeli military technology have fuelled a fierce Spotify boycott, amplified by the “No Music for Genocide” movement, which sees artists withdrawing their catalogues in protest. Meanwhile, artists fume over payments as low as fractions of a cent per stream. In a stunning twist, activist group Anna’s Archive scraped Spotify’s entire 300TB catalogue—86 million tracks—releasing it free for all. This bold move exposes the chasm between corporate greed & artist welfare.
Spotify’s Pitiful Payouts—Artists Left Penniless
Spotify’s payment model is a scandal, leaving most artists unpaid. The platform’s 1,000-stream minimum threshold excludes the majority, meaning countless musicians receive $0 for their contributions. For those who qualify, payouts average a meagre $0.0018 translating to $1,800–$3,000 for 1 million streams, far below a living wage for full-time professionals. Touring, a common survival tactic, is cost-prohibitive for most, with travel, equipment & promotion costs often exceeding earnings, particularly in high-cost markets. Spotify cites costs like taxes & fees as justification, but this rings hollow against its billion-dollar profits, sparking outrage among creators worldwide. As someone who has known & worked with a large number of musicians, I can say most are not rich. Those that can afford to have pulled their music, but many cannot. Even among those who can’t afford to, all who have chosen to leave their music on the platform in hopes of generating any sort of income are strongly against their songs being used to generate investments in killer machines rather than contributing to the music industry.
Nearly a Billion Dollars Diverted to Weaponry While Artists Starve
While Spotify claims financial constraints, its actions tell a different tale. Daniel Ek’s $702 million investment in Helsing, crafting lethal AI drones, dwarfs the pittances paid to artists and has drawn ire from the “No Music for Genocide” movement, which links it to alleged support for israeli weaponry. This massive investment in a single entity, made via his personal fund Prima Materia, contrasts sharply with the $11.7 billion paid to rights holders in 2024, of which its estimated 15,000,000 musicians see mere crumbs. The hypocrisy is glaring, as Ek’s war tech investment in a single entity matches 6% of that sum, prompting accusations of prioritising destruction over the livelihoods of those who fuel Spotify’s success. Saab’s supply chain links to israel, as a Helsing partner, further stokes speculation, intensifying the boycott.
The Activist’s Defiant Strike—Free Music for All
On December 20, 2025, Anna’s Archive, a pirate group famed for book digitisation, struck back. They scraped Spotify’s full catalogue, extracting 86 million audio files and 256 million metadata rows via public APIs, bypassing DRM. Released as a 300TB torrent, this “preservation archive” offers free access, challenging Spotify’s profits & future weapons investments. Prioritising 99.6% of popular streams, the scrape includes detailed artist data & audio features, now circulating on P2P networks. This empowers fans but threatens Spotify’s legal & financial stability, with supporters hailing it as a stand against greed & critics warning of piracy’s legal fallout. Timed with the boycott’s peak, this act amplifies the call for fairness.
The Fallout—Will Spotify Reform or Collapse?
Spotify confirms the scrape and investigates, hinting at tighter security measures. The boycott, backed by the “No Music for Genocide” movement & artists like Massive Attack, risks eroding its 600 million-plus user base. For fans, the 300TB torrent offers free music, though downloading invites legal risks. Musicians, especially in Japan, push for higher royalties, while competitors like Tidal gain traction. Searches for “Spotify boycott 2025,” “free music torrent,” and “Spotify artist pay” spike, boosting this topic’s relevance. The industry holds its breath, wondering if Spotify will raise payouts or lose ground in the face of this dual challenge.
Spotify’s saga, marred by a boycott over alleged israeli weaponry funding and a massive scrape, marks a turning point. The “No Music for Genocide” movement highlights the betrayal as billions fund war tech, while its 15,000,000 musician, particularly in Japan, languish on fractions of cents if they receive anything at all. Anna’s Archive’s free catalogue offers a defiant alternative, forcing a reckoning. The future of music streaming hangs in the balance.
What’s your stance? Should Spotify prioritise artists over weaponry or is the activist scrape justified? Share below & subscribe for more news!
Unless otherwise noted, image assets above are NOT original content & are shared under fair use doctrine with NO claims to authorship or ownership.
Contact necrolicious@necrolicious.com for credit or removal.
This post was sponsored by…ME! If you’d like to support, please buy my original meme merch from Necrolicious.store or check out my affiliate links to get yourself some other cool things. Additional affiliate links may be contained in the above article. If you click on an affiliate link & sign up/make a purchase, I may earn a commission. This does not increase the price you pay for the product or service, so it helps support this website at no cost to you.
